Note: The comments for this entry can be syndicated via RSS.
You can trackback from your own site.
libsarelaughable —
On 2-16-2007 at
2:27 pm
oh you mean like the faith of evolution, or the faith of global warming caused by man?? I’ve noticed the intolerance for anyone who dares disagree with the high priests of the religion of ’science’. What a joke this ‘flow chart’ is. all evidence is interpreted in light of theory. In the case of evolution, and ‘man-made’ global warming, all evidence supports the faith, no matter how lame it is.
‘
look at what happened to Sternberg, for daring to question the faith of evolution. In Europe, Henk Tennekes was dismissed as research director of the Royal Dutch Meteorological Society after questioning the scientific underpinnings of global warming.
.
evolution has joined that other quaint 19th century notion of marxism on the ash heap of history. All that keeps it, and ‘man made global warming’ going is the faith of the adherents, and the desperate need to hold onto the power they derive from these lies.
Porter Venn —
On 2-16-2007 at
3:31 pm
oh you mean like the faith of evolution
No, that’s science, not faith.
or the faith of global warming caused by man??
Bzzzzt. Sorry, wrong again, That is also science.
I’ve noticed the intolerance for anyone who dares disagree with the high priests of the religion of ’science’.
Except that Science isn’t a relgion, and there are no “high priests.” You seem to have a knack for an inability to grasp basic concepts.
What a joke this ‘flow chart’ is. all evidence is interpreted in light of theory. In the case of evolution, and ‘man-made’ global warming, all evidence supports the faith, no matter how lame it is.
No, not “faith” again, Science. It’s very simple, and I appologize that the flow chart is to complicated for you to understand, but trust me when I tell you that it’s creator (not me) went to great lengths to make it as simple as possible for people with…shall we say… learning disabilties to grasp the meaning.
look at what happened to Sternberg, for daring to question the faith of evolution.
Whoops! there you go again, no such thing as “Faith in evolution”. It’s called the “Theory of Evolution”. Having problems with that word too huh? No problem, for more information on what a theory is click here.
In Europe, Henk Tennekes was dismissed as research director of the Royal Dutch Meteorological Society after questioning the scientific underpinnings of global warming.
And for every Henk Tennekes, there are hundreds, if not thousands of Scientists and Research that shows that Global Warming, is indeed, real.
But.. oh no… you choose to ignore that right? I’m sure in your mind it makes way more sense to invalidate Millions of hours of research with the opinions of a few crackpots who agree with your point of view.
evolution has joined that other quaint 19th century notion of marxism on the ash heap of history.
Whooops! there you go again. Evolution is a Scientific Theory, Marxism is a Human Socio-Econimic Theory. They actually have nothing to do with each other, but I can understand your confusion, I’m sure somewhere (Rush, O’Reilly, Anne Coulter) someone must have glued the two together, and you being the lazy Conservative you are, decided to take that BS at face value. No worries! You can now redeem yourself, I refer you to the Wiki entry on Marxism, good reading, self-educate! Take the Initiative! I know you can do it! We’re all rooting for you!
All that keeps it, and ‘man made global warming’ going is the faith of the adherents, and the desperate need to hold onto the power they derive from these lies.
Whoopps… there you go again. Remember now, GLOBAL WARMING = Science.
Ok Lib, you’ve got a lot of work ahead of you, go to it and report back on what you learn. I think enlarging your ceribral cortex can be a very fufilling thing, sure, it’s work, but you being a conservative and all shouldn’t be afraid of a little homework eh?
Bazule —
On 2-16-2007 at
4:16 pm
Ouch! Ouchie! When I look at the Science chart, it hurts my head, it’s too complicated! I can’t follow all those branches, and lines leading back to earlier boxes! Who has time to figure all that out? It was obviously created by some Lib someplace. I like the Faith chart much better, it’s very easy to understand, and I don’t have to think about all those other possibilities. That does it, I’m going to church on Sunday and becoming a Born Again. Stupid Libs. Oh, and Praise The Lord! (I’m going to need to start getting used to saying that)
libsarelaughable —
On 2-16-2007 at
7:55 pm
porter: I see you’re good at repeating the mantra, but very poor in dealing with the issues, but thats typical for liberals!! So try again, to answer this very basic issue: if its ’science’ and ‘rational’ then why do people who disagree with an interpretation of data get silenced, and shoved aside? Why can’t your ‘rational’ ’scientists’ debate the issues, instead of silencing any opposition, ala 1984?
‘
you don’t get it, TRUTH is TRUTH whether one person believes it, or no one believes it. If Marxism doesn’t have anything to do with evolution, then why did Karl Marx want to write the forward to Darwin’s book?????????
‘
I know you have no answers, because anything that questioins your FAITH is dismissed….because you don’t have any answers…
libsarelaughable —
On 2-16-2007 at
7:58 pm
since you’re so ’scientific’ and ‘rational’ after you deal with the silencing of those who disagree with the prevailing ’scientific’ orthodoxy, perhaps you can answer these questions.
;
Given the big bang, where did the matter come from, and why did it explode?
‘
given evolution, how did a molecule become self-replicating?
‘
given global warming is caused by man, why is mars experiencing global warming? (oh yeah nasa landed an SUV or 2)
Aaron —
On 2-16-2007 at
11:13 pm
“evolution has joined that other quaint 19th century notion of marxism on the ash heap of history.”
.
Woa, wait, they have marxism on your planet too?!
libsarelaughable —
On 2-17-2007 at
7:45 am
I see none of you ‘tolerant’ liberals can answer the question, or even acknowledge a problem exists. in the ‘tolerant’ liberal view, no other opinions are tolerated, and any who disagree should, of course, be silenced. Some pigs are more equal than others.
So try again, to answer this very basic issue: if its ’science’ and ‘rational’ then why do people who disagree with an interpretation of data get silenced, and shoved aside? Why can’t your ‘rational’ ’scientists’ debate the issues, instead of silencing any opposition, ala 1984?
Sigh… you didn’t do your homework did you Lib?
Again if you were to understand how science works, and more specifically, the “Scientific Method” works, than any opinion or interpretation that can be back by experimentation, or emperical evidence can replace, or even update a theory.
TRUTH is TRUTH whether one person believes it, or no one believes it.
Uhh… no… BZZZT… Wrong Again…. sigh….
A Scientific Truth, or Law, is one that is backed by experimentation Lib. It’s not something that someone simply “believes”.
If that’s the credo you live by, then I suggest you become a Christian, Muslim, Quaker, Shaker, or a faithfull believer in Zoltar, the 3 Headed Pig God from the planet Zoltar VII.
Again you have proven yourself to be an intellectually lazy conservative, and again that’s not a surprise.
However you can always redeem yourself.
To provide yourself a little insight on Science, and the Scientific Method, what it is, and how it works, you can try this link, or this link, or even this link.
Happy Reading.
John Z —
On 2-17-2007 at
5:49 pm
Why bother replying to this clown? He won’t read anything, your discussions are like trying to explain fire to a caveman. Forget it, it’s a waste of time, some people will never “Get it”
libsarelaughable —
On 2-20-2007 at
3:48 pm
porter, thanks for proving again how liberals have a lack of critical thinking skills. Again you evade the issue, and talk about the ’scientific method’ hyadaydaydaydyadyd same old BS….truth is the HIGH PRIESTS of evolution, and global warming, don’t ALLOW any other viewpoints. but like the stalinist liberals you are, you just march in lockstep and say seig heil….like the good little liberal nazis you are….
‘
again, why do these ’scientists’ have to SILENCE those they disagree with…instead of DEBATING them??? HMMMMM?? why don’t they use the SCIENTIFIC METHOD???? instead of the COMMUNIST METHOD?? HHMMMMMM???? oh and why did MARX want to write the forward to
the ‘origin of the species’?? can’t answer that one either HMMMM??? you cowardly little liberal piece of shit!! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHAHAHH
thanks for the laughs!!!
;
ps: you can’t redeem yourself……
Well there it is. Trying to have a discussion with someone who thinks the Scientific Method is the “same ole BS” run by High Priests etc… is akin to having an arguement with someone who thinks 2+2 = 5. There’s really no point in continuing this discussion, it would be insanity to argue with the insane. (Not only that, I’m still not convinced someone is’nt goofing around, no one is really this clueless)
libsarelaughable — On 2-16-2007 at 2:27 pm
oh you mean like the faith of evolution, or the faith of global warming caused by man?? I’ve noticed the intolerance for anyone who dares disagree with the high priests of the religion of ’science’. What a joke this ‘flow chart’ is. all evidence is interpreted in light of theory. In the case of evolution, and ‘man-made’ global warming, all evidence supports the faith, no matter how lame it is.
‘
look at what happened to Sternberg, for daring to question the faith of evolution. In Europe, Henk Tennekes was dismissed as research director of the Royal Dutch Meteorological Society after questioning the scientific underpinnings of global warming.
.
evolution has joined that other quaint 19th century notion of marxism on the ash heap of history. All that keeps it, and ‘man made global warming’ going is the faith of the adherents, and the desperate need to hold onto the power they derive from these lies.
Porter Venn — On 2-16-2007 at 3:31 pm
oh you mean like the faith of evolution
No, that’s science, not faith.
or the faith of global warming caused by man??
Bzzzzt. Sorry, wrong again, That is also science.
I’ve noticed the intolerance for anyone who dares disagree with the high priests of the religion of ’science’.
Except that Science isn’t a relgion, and there are no “high priests.” You seem to have a knack for an inability to grasp basic concepts.
What a joke this ‘flow chart’ is. all evidence is interpreted in light of theory. In the case of evolution, and ‘man-made’ global warming, all evidence supports the faith, no matter how lame it is.
No, not “faith” again, Science. It’s very simple, and I appologize that the flow chart is to complicated for you to understand, but trust me when I tell you that it’s creator (not me) went to great lengths to make it as simple as possible for people with…shall we say… learning disabilties to grasp the meaning.
Maybe this will help.
look at what happened to Sternberg, for daring to question the faith of evolution.
Whoops! there you go again, no such thing as “Faith in evolution”. It’s called the “Theory of Evolution”. Having problems with that word too huh? No problem, for more information on what a theory is click here.
In Europe, Henk Tennekes was dismissed as research director of the Royal Dutch Meteorological Society after questioning the scientific underpinnings of global warming.
And for every Henk Tennekes, there are hundreds, if not thousands of Scientists and Research that shows that Global Warming, is indeed, real.
But.. oh no… you choose to ignore that right? I’m sure in your mind it makes way more sense to invalidate Millions of hours of research with the opinions of a few crackpots who agree with your point of view.
evolution has joined that other quaint 19th century notion of marxism on the ash heap of history.
Whooops! there you go again. Evolution is a Scientific Theory, Marxism is a Human Socio-Econimic Theory. They actually have nothing to do with each other, but I can understand your confusion, I’m sure somewhere (Rush, O’Reilly, Anne Coulter) someone must have glued the two together, and you being the lazy Conservative you are, decided to take that BS at face value. No worries! You can now redeem yourself, I refer you to the Wiki entry on Marxism, good reading, self-educate! Take the Initiative! I know you can do it! We’re all rooting for you!
All that keeps it, and ‘man made global warming’ going is the faith of the adherents, and the desperate need to hold onto the power they derive from these lies.
Whoopps… there you go again. Remember now, GLOBAL WARMING = Science.
Ok Lib, you’ve got a lot of work ahead of you, go to it and report back on what you learn. I think enlarging your ceribral cortex can be a very fufilling thing, sure, it’s work, but you being a conservative and all shouldn’t be afraid of a little homework eh?
Bazule — On 2-16-2007 at 4:16 pm
Ouch! Ouchie! When I look at the Science chart, it hurts my head, it’s too complicated! I can’t follow all those branches, and lines leading back to earlier boxes! Who has time to figure all that out? It was obviously created by some Lib someplace. I like the Faith chart much better, it’s very easy to understand, and I don’t have to think about all those other possibilities. That does it, I’m going to church on Sunday and becoming a Born Again. Stupid Libs. Oh, and Praise The Lord! (I’m going to need to start getting used to saying that)
libsarelaughable — On 2-16-2007 at 7:55 pm
porter: I see you’re good at repeating the mantra, but very poor in dealing with the issues, but thats typical for liberals!! So try again, to answer this very basic issue: if its ’science’ and ‘rational’ then why do people who disagree with an interpretation of data get silenced, and shoved aside? Why can’t your ‘rational’ ’scientists’ debate the issues, instead of silencing any opposition, ala 1984?
‘
you don’t get it, TRUTH is TRUTH whether one person believes it, or no one believes it. If Marxism doesn’t have anything to do with evolution, then why did Karl Marx want to write the forward to Darwin’s book?????????
‘
I know you have no answers, because anything that questioins your FAITH is dismissed….because you don’t have any answers…
libsarelaughable — On 2-16-2007 at 7:58 pm
since you’re so ’scientific’ and ‘rational’ after you deal with the silencing of those who disagree with the prevailing ’scientific’ orthodoxy, perhaps you can answer these questions.
;
Given the big bang, where did the matter come from, and why did it explode?
‘
given evolution, how did a molecule become self-replicating?
‘
given global warming is caused by man, why is mars experiencing global warming? (oh yeah nasa landed an SUV or 2)
Aaron — On 2-16-2007 at 11:13 pm
“evolution has joined that other quaint 19th century notion of marxism on the ash heap of history.”
.
Woa, wait, they have marxism on your planet too?!
libsarelaughable — On 2-17-2007 at 7:45 am
I see none of you ‘tolerant’ liberals can answer the question, or even acknowledge a problem exists. in the ‘tolerant’ liberal view, no other opinions are tolerated, and any who disagree should, of course, be silenced. Some pigs are more equal than others.
Porter Venn — On 2-17-2007 at 5:11 pm
So try again, to answer this very basic issue: if its ’science’ and ‘rational’ then why do people who disagree with an interpretation of data get silenced, and shoved aside? Why can’t your ‘rational’ ’scientists’ debate the issues, instead of silencing any opposition, ala 1984?
Sigh… you didn’t do your homework did you Lib?
Again if you were to understand how science works, and more specifically, the “Scientific Method” works, than any opinion or interpretation that can be back by experimentation, or emperical evidence can replace, or even update a theory.
TRUTH is TRUTH whether one person believes it, or no one believes it.
Uhh… no… BZZZT… Wrong Again…. sigh….
A Scientific Truth, or Law, is one that is backed by experimentation Lib. It’s not something that someone simply “believes”.
If that’s the credo you live by, then I suggest you become a Christian, Muslim, Quaker, Shaker, or a faithfull believer in Zoltar, the 3 Headed Pig God from the planet Zoltar VII.
Again you have proven yourself to be an intellectually lazy conservative, and again that’s not a surprise.
However you can always redeem yourself.
To provide yourself a little insight on Science, and the Scientific Method, what it is, and how it works, you can try this link, or this link, or even this link.
Happy Reading.
John Z — On 2-17-2007 at 5:49 pm
Why bother replying to this clown? He won’t read anything, your discussions are like trying to explain fire to a caveman. Forget it, it’s a waste of time, some people will never “Get it”
libsarelaughable — On 2-20-2007 at 3:48 pm
porter, thanks for proving again how liberals have a lack of critical thinking skills. Again you evade the issue, and talk about the ’scientific method’ hyadaydaydaydyadyd same old BS….truth is the HIGH PRIESTS of evolution, and global warming, don’t ALLOW any other viewpoints. but like the stalinist liberals you are, you just march in lockstep and say seig heil….like the good little liberal nazis you are….
‘
again, why do these ’scientists’ have to SILENCE those they disagree with…instead of DEBATING them??? HMMMMM?? why don’t they use the SCIENTIFIC METHOD???? instead of the COMMUNIST METHOD?? HHMMMMMM???? oh and why did MARX want to write the forward to
the ‘origin of the species’?? can’t answer that one either HMMMM??? you cowardly little liberal piece of shit!! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHAHAHH
thanks for the laughs!!!
;
ps: you can’t redeem yourself……
Porter Venn — On 2-20-2007 at 5:47 pm
Well there it is. Trying to have a discussion with someone who thinks the Scientific Method is the “same ole BS” run by High Priests etc… is akin to having an arguement with someone who thinks 2+2 = 5. There’s really no point in continuing this discussion, it would be insanity to argue with the insane. (Not only that, I’m still not convinced someone is’nt goofing around, no one is really this clueless)
Mark — On 4-18-2007 at 1:24 am
Thank You